Original Research

Feasibility of an at-home telerehabilitation programme for upper limb impairment post-stroke

Louise van Wyk, Maatje Kloppers, Lee-Ann J. Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi
Rehabilitation Advances in Developing Health Systems | Vol 2, No 1 | a24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/radhs.v2i1.24 | © 2025 Louise van Wyk, Maatje Kloppers, Lee-Ann J. Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 November 2024 | Published: 31 March 2025

About the author(s)

Louise van Wyk, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Maatje Kloppers, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Lee-Ann J. Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; and, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia

Abstract

Background: Access to stroke rehabilitation in low-resource South African areas is limited. Telerehabilitation (TR) offers a promising solution, particularly for upper limb recovery post-stroke.

Aim: To assess the feasibility of a task-oriented TR home programme for mild to moderate upper limb impairment post-stroke in a South African context.

Setting: Bishop Lavis, South Africa, a low-income area.

Methods: A single-site parallel randomised feasibility study was conducted. Feasibility outcomes included: process, resource, management and scientific outcomes. Outcome measures included satisfaction survey, log sheets, Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and BORG Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. Participants completed an 8-week home programme (H-Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program [GRASP]). The experimental group received weekly TR, while the control group received face-to-face care.

Results: A total of 12 participants were recruited, with 10 completing the programme. The experimental group reported 96.9% perceived benefit, 60.0% exercise and task adherence and had 41 telephonic sessions in total. The control group reported 76.9% perceived benefit, no exercise adherence, 20.0% task adherence and attended 13 face-to-face sessions in total (67.5% non-attendance). Post-intervention, FMA-UE improved significantly (control: p = 0.0003; experimental: p = 0.0013) with a mean difference of 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.2 to 18.2). The CAHAI showed borderline significance (control: p = 0.0556; experimental: p = 0.0601) with a mean difference of -1.0 (95% CI: -3.2 to 1.2).

Conclusion: The feasibility study achieved success in retention rates, safety and perceived benefit for the experimental group, with treatment equivalence in the CAHAI scores. Recruitment rate and exercise and task adherence were below criteria. Perceived benefit in the control group fell short. Treatment equivalence for FMA-UE scores exceeded the set margin.

Contribution: Persons with upper limb impairments post-stroke in low-resource contexts may benefit from a repetitive task-oriented TR home programme.


Keywords

telerehabilitation; stroke; upper limb; feasibility, repetitive task-oriented training.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 94
Total article views: 154


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.